Major breakthroughs are more often the product of persistent, incremental work than of sudden insight, because progress depends on accumulated effort.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which it is based.
Write your response
Give yourself 30 minutes, then get an instant estimate against the official rubric.
Major breakthroughs are more often the product of persistent, incremental work than of sudden insight, because progress depends on accumulated effort.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which it is based.
An expert estimate against the official rubric, not an official ETS score. ETS scores with a human reader plus the e-rater engine.
Your estimated score and rubric breakdown will appear here.
A reliable structure for any Issue prompt.
- 1Take a clear position in the first paragraph. The reader should know exactly where you stand on the issue before the body begins.
- 2Develop two or three reasons, each with a specific example. Depth beats a long list of thin points.
- 3Answer the strongest counter-argument. Engaging the other side is what separates a 5 from a 4.
- 4Leave two minutes to proofread. A few clean sentences at the end lift the language score.
For the full 0–6 band descriptors and what each score means, see the AWA grader guide.
How to approach this prompt.
This is a claim plus a reason, so test both. Even granting that accumulated effort matters, ask whether the dramatic "sudden insight" is usually just the visible tip of long incremental work, which would make the dichotomy itself misleading.
Points for and against.
A strong essay does not just pick a side. Weigh the best case each way, then explain which considerations shape your own view.
In support
- Famous eureka moments are usually preceded by years of grinding preparation, so the insight is the surfacing of accumulated effort, not a substitute for it.
- Much of science advances through unglamorous replication, measurement, and refinement rather than single dramatic leaps.
Against, or complicating
- Some genuine paradigm shifts reframe a field in a way no amount of incremental work would have produced on its own.
- The stated reason overreaches: progress can depend on accumulated effort and still be triggered by a sudden reframing, so the "because" does not settle the claim.
Examples you could use.
Specific, relevant examples are what readers reward most. Here are concrete cases you could adapt for this exact statement. Use them as reasoning, not as facts to recite.
- 1Darwin's decades of observation and drafting behind the theory of evolution, the opposite of a single flash.
- 2The long, iterative accumulation of data behind the Human Genome Project.
- 3Einstein's reframing of space and time, often cited as a conceptual leap rather than mere accumulation.
A common trap on this prompt.
Accepting the "because" clause as automatically supporting the claim. That progress depends on accumulated effort does not prove breakthroughs come more from incremental work than insight, since the two are often the same process seen at different moments.
GRE essay questions, answered.
More Issue prompts.
Scientists have a responsibility to weigh the social consequences o…
Practise Science & researchScientific research should be judged primarily by its practical ben…
Practise EducationUniversities should require every student to take a range of course…
Practise EducationThe primary purpose of education should be to prepare students for…
Practise EducationStudents learn more from teachers who challenge their assumptions t…
Practise Government & policyGovernments should focus their funding on basic scientific research…
PractisePut it all together.
Write this essay inside a free, full-length, section-adaptive mock and get your whole score report at once.