Skip to content
GREMockTests
All AWA prompts
Analyze an IssueEducation

The primary purpose of education should be to prepare students for employment rather than to cultivate broad intellectual curiosity.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning. In developing and supporting your position, consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true, and explain how those considerations shape your view.

Write your response

Give yourself 30 minutes, then get an instant estimate against the official rubric.

Issue prompt

The primary purpose of education should be to prepare students for employment rather than to cultivate broad intellectual curiosity.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning. In developing and supporting your position, consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true, and explain how those considerations shape your view.

0 words

An expert estimate against the official rubric, not an official ETS score. ETS scores with a human reader plus the e-rater engine.

Your estimated score and rubric breakdown will appear here.

How to approach it

A reliable structure for any Issue prompt.

  1. 1Take a clear position in the first paragraph. The reader should know exactly where you stand on the issue before the body begins.
  2. 2Develop two or three reasons, each with a specific example. Depth beats a long list of thin points.
  3. 3Answer the strongest counter-argument. Engaging the other side is what separates a 5 from a 4.
  4. 4Leave two minutes to proofread. A few clean sentences at the end lift the language score.

For the full 0–6 band descriptors and what each score means, see the AWA grader guide.

This prompt

How to approach this prompt.

This is framed as an either/or, and the strongest responses usually refuse the false choice: the most durable career preparation is often exactly the transferable, curiosity-driven capacity to learn. Attack the word "rather than" and argue the two goals reinforce each other more than they compete.

Both sides

Points for and against.

A strong essay does not just pick a side. Weigh the best case each way, then explain which considerations shape your own view.

In support

  • Students and families take on significant debt, so an education that leaves graduates unemployable has failed them on the terms they actually paid for.
  • Fields change fast, but concrete, job-ready skills give graduates the immediate footing they need to enter the workforce and then keep learning.

Against, or complicating

  • Specific job skills age out quickly, while the ability to reason, read critically, and teach oneself new material is what lets a worker survive several career changes.
  • Defining education purely by employment cedes its civic function: forming citizens who can evaluate evidence and arguments, which no employer is paid to supply.
Evidence

Examples you could use.

Specific, relevant examples are what readers reward most. Here are concrete cases you could adapt for this exact statement. Use them as reasoning, not as facts to recite.

  • 1A coding bootcamp graduate proficient in one framework that is deprecated within a few years, versus a computer-science graduate who learned the underlying principles.
  • 2Liberal-arts graduates who move into management because they can write and reason, even without a vocational major.
  • 3Vocational and apprenticeship systems, such as Germany's dual-education model, as a case where employment focus clearly serves students well.
Watch out

A common trap on this prompt.

Treating the two purposes as fully separable. An essay that simply picks a side and defends it misses that the sharpest position usually questions whether preparing for employment and cultivating curiosity are even in genuine opposition.

Questions

GRE essay questions, answered.

There is no required word count. High-scoring Analyze an Issue essays are typically well-developed across four to six paragraphs, roughly 400 to 600 words, but a reader rewards depth of reasoning and specific support, not raw length. A tight, fully developed 450-word essay outscores a padded 700-word one.
The GRE Analytical Writing task is scored holistically from 0 to 6 in half-point steps against the official ETS descriptors. The reported score averages one trained human reader and the e-rater engine; if they disagree by more than a point, a second human reader adjudicates. It is reported separately from the 260 to 340 Verbal and Quant total.
No. This is an original prompt written in the official Analyze an Issue style so you can practise freely. The real ETS pool is published on the ETS website. Practising on same-style prompts builds the exact skills the scored task rewards, since every Issue prompt uses the same task instructions and the same rubric.

Put it all together.

Write this essay inside a free, full-length, section-adaptive mock and get your whole score report at once.